60s fashion dresses Fashion of the 60s
SKU: 76184610280
60s fashion dresses

60s fashion dresses Fashion of the 60s

Sale price$21.08 Regular price$23.42
Save 10%
Size: 4

Pay in installments of $5.86 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 29 - Jul 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

60s fashion dresses Fashion of the 60s#589 to 592 These well dressed ladies are a great way to showcase your appreciation for the fashion of the 60s era. These prints would suit a female domain such as wardrobe, bathroom, entrance to a bedroom, bedroom or office Please note: This size of this print is a little smaller than the remainder. The print should still be able to be framed up the same as the other 24 Date: 1965 Publisher: Mode Studio Paper Size: 208 x 320mm Condition: Good. Note a

#589 to 592

These well-dressed ladies are a great way to showcase your appreciation for the fashion of the 60s era. These prints would suit a female domain such as wardrobe, bathroom, entrance to a bedroom, bedroom or office

Please note: This size of this print is a little smaller than the remainder. The print should still be able to be framed up the same as the other 24

Date: 1965

Publisher: Mode Studio

Paper Size: 208 x 320mm

Condition: Good. Note a slight watermark at the bottom of the print. will not affect framing

Price: $60

Description: These prints are an example of the earlier patterns to be purchased for home dressmaking.

Provenance:

Fashion in the 60s

The 1960s fashion could be described as bipolar in every way!

In the early years of the decade, fashion continued along the lines of the 1950s
conservative, restrained and more classic in design and style. Skirt suits and
coordinating accessories were emphasized as one decade transitioned into the next.


First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy epitomized this look during her husband’s presidential
campaign and short presidency. She was admired around the world for her put-together, lady-like look consisting of boxy skirt-suits like the Givenchy suits and luxurious coats–all accessorized with white gloves, pearls, and a matching hat. This look was being produced by the likes of Hubert de Givenchy and Cristóbal Balenciaga but as the decade progressed, it became clear that the momentum was towards a new kind of designer in the 1960s.


The late 60’s were the exact opposite. Bright swirling colours, psychedelic tie-dyed shirts and long hair and beards were commonplace. Women wore unbelievably short skirts and men wore tunics and capes. This foray into fantasy would not have been believed just one decade before.

The cultural phenomenon termed Swinging London began in 1955 but reached its zenith in the early- to mid-1960s. It was a phenomenon that focused on youth, spotlighting music and fashion. It brought us The Beatles and the miniskirt, Twiggy and The Who. The designer who led the way in the “youthquake” was Mary Quant who opened her first shop, Bazaar, on the King’s Road in Chelsea, London in 1955. Quant’s simple, colourful designs appealed to teenagers and young people who had more disposable income than any generation before. It differed from the stuffy looks of the older generation and appealed to young women who embraced the child-like styles Quant produced. Fashion historian James Laver writes of Quant in Costume and Fashion: A Concise History,

An enduring icon of the 1950s and ‘60s, movie star Audrey Hepburn embraced the
progression of sixties fashion up to the hippie aesthetic of the last part of the decade. Having firmly established herself as a leading lady in 1950s films like Roman
Holiday, Sabrina, and Funny Face, Hepburn’s influence continued into the sixties.

In 1961, she starred as Holly Golightly in one of her most iconic films, Breakfast at
Tiffany’s In this film, like so many others, Hubert de Givenchy designed the costumes, including the iconic black dress from the opening scene. Hepburn and Givenchy worked together both on- and off-screen to create a simple, but stylish wardrobe that was easily copied by women of all means.

In the early 1960s, Hepburn wore feminine, Jackie Kennedy-esque skirt suits. Like the First Lady, she paired these suits with the requisite accessories: gloves and hat, like the green Givenchy suit worn in Paris When It Sizzles in 1962 (Fig. 18). The clothes she wore in 1963’s Charade would not have looked out of place on Kennedy but also cut a stylish figure as she gallivanted through Paris. As the decade progressed, so did her fashion. In the mid-sixties, Hepburn began to wear more “Mod” styles with bright colours and minidresses working their way into her wardrobe. In the 1966 film How to Steal a Million, she sported white-rimmed sunglasses à la Space Age styles and a stylish bob hairstyle accented by dark eyeliner to give her the popular doe-eyed look of the period

Though she would remain admired for her fashion for the rest of her life, by 1969, when the fashion world had started to turn to Eastern influences and longer skirts, Hepburn married Andrea Dotti in a pink minidress. Looking happy, she represented the part of the population, including couture designers like Givenchy, who had not yet embraced the new style.


This is an excerpt fomhttps://fashionhistory.fitnyc.edu/1960-1969/

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 76184610280

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell 60s fashion dresses

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1004 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jose V.
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Very nice and the price is great
Color: Blue
Looks a works great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Derrick Logan
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 4
I like it
Color: grey, Color: grey
It’s not expensive but well made. The tack thing doesn’t spin. Idea for daily wear with a nice look to it. I gave it a 4 because the tact thing doesn’t spin and I like a larger watch face. All in all I may buy more as fashion watches for daily use.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kevin Okeefe
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Beautiful watch!
Color: silver black
Love it!! Great looking and excellent quality watch...looks like a Rolex Daytona. So far keeps perfect time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Dean
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 1
Not water resistant
Color: silver black, Color: silver black
Have had it less than a month, shower and swim with watch on. Water is under the face. Very disappointed in the quality, I get it is a relatively cheap watch, but quality should be better than this. Will never buy again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Martha A Calvillo
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 3
Water is getting into the watch.
Color: silver white
It’s a nice watch. I own pieces from other brands, and I stopped wearing this one for about a month; when I decided to put it back on, it was still running. I found this odd, since it’s supposed to be an automatic watch—meaning you need to wear it to keep it wound and functioning—and it supposedly doesn't use a battery. Another thing: every time I wash my hands, water gets inside the watch, even though it’s rated for a depth of 30 meters. I have my doubts as to whether it’s truly an automatic or not. Does anyone else here own one?
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2026

recommand products