red dress for a christmas party Birthday girl party dress red Baby girl spring dress satin Toddler gir – Colibri Fashion Studio
SKU: 69550356417
red dress for a christmas party

red dress for a christmas party Birthday girl party dress red Baby girl spring dress satin Toddler gir – Colibri Fashion Studio

$19.57 $21.75
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on bionetnettoyage.com >
Size: 4
Size Recommendation How To Measure

Pay in installments of $5.44 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 30 - Jul 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

red dress for a christmas party Birthday girl party dress red Baby girl spring dress satin Toddler gir – Colibri Fashion Studio10% SALE FOR THE FIRST ORDER This dress is perfect for birthday, wedding, first communion, baptism, dancing and family photos. Color: Red, Ivory, Black, White, Dusty rose Depending on the supply of fabrics, shades of the same color may differ slightly. If you order a dress for the same event together with another of my customers, write about it in the comments to the order. I will use the same shade of fabric. Please check the measurements before

10% SALE FOR THE FIRST ORDER

This dress is perfect for birthday, wedding, first communion, baptism, dancing and family photos.

Color:

Red, Ivory, Black, White, Dusty rose

Depending on the supply of fabrics, shades of the same color may differ slightly. If you order a dress for the same event together with another of my customers, write about it in the comments to the order. I will use the same shade of fabric.

Please check the measurements before placing your order.

MEASUREMENT
Size 1
Height 86cm / 33.8inch
Chest 52cm / 20.5inch
Waist 50cm / 19.6inch

Size 2
Height 92cm / 36.2inch
Chest 54cm / 21.3inch
Waist 51cm / 20inch

Size 3
Height 98cm / 38.5inch
Chest 55cm / 21.7inch
Waist 52cm / 20.5inch

Size 4
Height 104 cm / 41 inches
Chest 57cm / 22.4inch
Waist 54cm / 21.2inch

Size 5
Height 110cm / 43.3inch
Chest 60cm / 23.6inch
Waist 56cm / 21.6inch

Size 6
Height 116cm / 45.6inch
Chest 61cm / 24inch
Waist 58cm / 22.8inch

Size 7
Height 122 cm / 48 inches
Chest 63cm / 24.8inch
Waist 60cm / 23.6inch

Size 8
Height 128cm / 50.4inch
Chest 65cm / 25.6inch
Waist 60cm / 23.6inch

Size 9
Height 134cm / 52.7inch
Chest 67cm / 26.3inch
Waist 62cm / 24.4inch

Size 10
Height 140cm / 55.1inch
Chest 69cm / 27.1inch
Waist 63cm / 24.8inch

Size 11
Height 146cm / 57.5inch
Chest 72cm / 28.3inch
Waist 65cm / 25.6inch

Size 12
Height 152 cm / 60 inches
Chest 75cm / 29.5inch
Waist 67cm / 26.3inch

Please choose the size according to our size chart which is posted in each listing. We can also make a custom size for you. Just choose the size close to your individual measurements and leave them in the notes at checkout please. The buyer is responsible for the measurements and we don't refund/exchange the item if it's made to incorrect measurements. The same is applied to custom order items.

Custom measurements
Please keep in mind that the customer is solely responsible for the measurements that he leaves in the comments to the order. If your event after a while, calculate how your girl can grow up by this time. And write down the measurements considering that the girl will grow up. I do not add to the growth and sew the dress exactly according to the measurements that you wrote in the comments to the order.

Custom size and custom size +
If your girl's measurements are between sizes and you want me to make your order according to individual measurements, please select the "custom size" option.
If your girl's measurements are over 60 inches, chest 32 inches and waist 30 inches please select the "custom size +" option.

Please note that each item is unique and handmade to order. The finished product may slightly differ from the image in the shade of fabrics. Contact me if the shade of the fabric matters to you and the dresses are ordered for one event.

We recommend that you steam the dress on arrival.

Orders placed with free shipping usually arrive within 3-5 weeks. If you want it to be delivered earlier, please select the type of express delivery that suits you when placing your order.

If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me!

Import duties, taxes and charges are not included in the item price or shipping charges.
These charges are the buyer's responsibility.
Please check with your country's customs office to determine what these additional costs will be prior to bidding / buying.
These charges are normally collected by the delivering freight (shipping) company or when you pick the item up - do not confuse them for additional shipping charges.

Subscribe to our Instagram page: https://www.instagram.com/colibri_fashion_studio/

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 69550356417

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell red dress for a christmas party

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 102 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014
K
Verified Purchase
KC
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent resource for defending why Christianity is not rooted in mythology
Format: Paperback
I bought this book as required reading for an introductory Old Testament class I was taking in seminary. Sad to say, the textbook mostly collects dust. To this day, I use Oswalt's book for reference and continue to recommend the reading of it to others. I do not believe one can fully defend the Christian faith without first knowing how firmly convinced some scholars and historians are that Christianity is rooted in mythology. I will not lie. If you read about some of these myths in a silo, you may find yourself leaning toward such false beliefs. When you take a step back and consider the time in history in which the Old Testament was written, the picture becomes more clear. In the introduction to the Old Testament class, we also read Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament by John H. Walton. Again, the text book is mostly collecting dust, I also repeatedly use this one as a reference. I would strongly recommend reading both books. The second is more academic in style than the first, but it helps lend further context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2015
P
Verified Purchase
P. Hayes
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
An inspiring take on the story of the Bible and reality.
Format: Kindle
This was an absolute pleasure to read. Oswalt utilizes his knowledge of ancient near east culture and religion to thorough debunk any effort to one might make to pretend that the Bible is of a similar mythology.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
J.M. Diener
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Is the Bible Really Unique?
Format: Kindle
Oswalt takes up the question of the uniqueness of the Christian Bible by focusing on the Old Testament (which is also the holy book of the Jews) and its similarities and differences to the myths of the periods in which it was put together. His comparison and contrast make for very interesting reading. He allows the two world views to stand alone, allowing the reader to understand his conclusions without forcing him/her to agree with the author. In reading this book, I also began to notice some very interesting parallels between the ancient worldview of "continuity" (versus the biblical view that Oswalt calls "transcendence") and some modern views being espoused in the Western world. Definitely worth a read whether or not you agree with him. It will help broaden your view both of your view and of the other side's view.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2013

recommand products

Leila Navy Blue Mermaid Deep V Neck Satin Long Prom Dress with Appliques, Navy Blue / UK 2
27.14
Pleated Floral Printed Tie Neck Knee Length Women Dress – Zara-Craft
21.24
LEO LIN - Zara Shirt Midi Dress
26.32
Zara Blue Green Floral Smocked V Neck Sleeveless Side Slit Sheath Midi – Brie
25.30
Open-Back Long Navy Blue Prom Dress with High Neck Navy / 11
28.85